[Minesweeper - (Soon to be Flower Field)] draft approaches

[colinleach]

Just the introduction.md in this case. I couldn't identify such clearly different approaches that would justify separate sections.

I'll read this through again on Saturday, so there may be some minor corrections added.

[colinleach]

I made a few tweaks but couldn't think of anything major,

Over to you for comments. Meanwhile, I'll see how many more of these I can get drafted before this burst of enthusiasm drains away.

[ABcDexter]

These look good :)

[BethanyG]

@ABcDexter -- Reviews in this repo should only be done by the maintainer team. Thanks!

[BethanyG]

Given this change, going to take this back to draft. After the deprecation/relaunch, we can then explain and revise this.

[BethanyG]

@colinleach So I think the thing to do here is to take what we have and copy it into the flower-field exercise. (i.e. a new PR).

We can then change the mine and minesweeper references and re-review. We can then close this PR in favor of the new flower field one.

Happy to have you do that, or I can. Either works. 😄 Just let me know!

[colinleach]

Sounds simple enough that I'll do it later today.

[colinleach]

It's funny to re-read this 15 months later.

Meanwhile, I'll see how many more of these I can get drafted before this burst of enthusiasm drains away

That draining didn't take long, for either of us!

[colinleach]

Replaced by #3935